This is an Educational blog maintained by SABARISH P, (MSc Physics, MEd, NET), Assistant Professor in Physical Science Education. Contact : pklsabarish@gmail.com

Wednesday 6 April 2022

LANGUAGE ACROSS THE CURRICULUM-Linguistic hazards in Pedagogic decision making-BEd notes

 

LANGUAGE ACROSS THE CURRICULUM-BEd notes

Unit 5 – Developing proficiency in written Comprehension and Production

Prepared by

Sabarish P

(MSc Physics, MEd, NET) 
 
Contact: pklsabarish@gmail.com

 

Linguistic hazards in Pedagogic decision making

 

Eight modes of human activities involving language

Listening: comprehending oral input/intake

Speaking: constructing meaningful utterances

Reading: understanding written texts

Writing: producing written texts/discourse

Viewing: attending to visual signs/information

Shaping: using visual means of expression

Watching: attending to the movements

Moving: using the whole body / person


A Comprehensive Literacy Model

Listening Comprehension Competence

Auditory-Visual Competence

Reading Competence

Writing Competence

Speaking Competence

Symbolic Decoding/Semiotic Competence

Media Competence

Literary and Aestetic Competence

Functional-Pragmatic Competence

Intercultural Competence

Language Learning Competence

Metalinguistic Competence/Language Awareness


Physical conditions:

a) for speech:

  • clarity of pronunciation;

  • ambient noise (trains, aircraft, ‘static’, etc.);

  • interference (crowded street, markets, pubs, parties, discos, etc.);

  • distortions (poor telephone lines, radio reception, public address systems);

  • weather conditions (wind, extreme cold, etc.).



b) for writing:

  • poor reproduction of print;

  • difficult handwriting;

  • poor lighting, etc.

c) Social conditions:

  • number and familiarity of interlocutors;

  • relative status of participants (power and solidarity, etc.);

  • presence/absence of audience or eavesdroppers;

  • social relationships between participants (e.g. friendliness/hostility, co-operativeness).

Time pressures:

  • different pressures for speaker/listener (real time) and writer/reader (more flexible);

  • preparation time (e.g. improvised vs routinised vs prepared in advance) for speeches, reports, etc.;

  • limitations on time allowed (e.g. by rules, expense, competing events and commitments,etc.) for turns and interactions;

  • Other pressures: financial; anxiety-producing situations (e.g. examinations),etc.

Psychological problems:

  • Prejudice that English is the most difficult language. This result in poor performance

Learning methods:

  • Use of artificial indirect method of teaching language.

  • Usually in direct method of language learning we follow LSRW. But in learning English we follow the sequence WRSL

  • This is against the maxim easy to difficult.

  • Inability of teachers to understand the difference between language skills and literature.

Problem of Concretizing the abstract idea

Translation method

  • It helps the learners to understand the text but bars from learning the language

Mother tongue interference

Lack of practice

Availability of Audio-visual aids and its ineffective use by teachers.

Lack of interest

Lack of motivation

Mistakes in language

Crowded classes

Mathematics seem to be most abstract and have a language (or languages) of their own, but when it comes to verbalising or “translating” the findings or the steps and procedures taken on the way towards these findings, the same discourse patterns hold true as in other subjects. For the natural sciences and their corresponding school subjects, language serves above all to convey and discuss hypotheses and probabilities, to argue and give explanations, but the products of scientific activity come into existence and are largely established beyond their expression in language (experimentation, measurements, observations etc.). For the social or human sciences and their corresponding school subjects, language is their very form of existence; history, for example, does not exist as such outside the realms of its expression in language.

As long as math, science, and history teachers assume that the English department bears responsibility for reading and writing instruction, then they'll see no reason to take on that responsibility themselves. Math, science, history, and English teachers tend to get nervous when people start talking about literacy instruction in the content areas. "But I don't know anything about teaching reading!" goes the usual reply. "I don't know how to help kids sound out words or read more fluently." Within each content area, teachers should have a clear and consistent understanding of what it means for students to read and write proficiently in that domain. Biology teachers shouldn't be telling history teachers how to guide students in the analysis of early political tracts, and history teachers shouldn't weigh in on how best to teach the writing of lab reports.


Practical Remedies to reduce the problem

  • Interdisciplinary collaboration: Collaboration between English language and subject teachers

  • Explicitly teach English language vocabulary and structures.

  • Build on ELLs' Background Knowledge to Increase Comprehension

  • Increase Writing Opportunities

  • Building a rapport with your class

  • Place of English should be defined

  • Building confidence among students by emphasizing more language learning skills

  • Keeping in mind the aims of teaching English

  • Solving socio-psychological problems

  • Building communication skills

  • Handling mistakes with care

  • Implement an effective direct systematic reading remediation program.

  • Integrating reading or writing into their content-based instruction.


Prepared by

Sabarish P

(MSc Physics, MEd, NET) 
 
Contact: pklsabarish@gmail.com